From the Cornell Assemblies

CJC Comments: 2007 Fall Procedural Protections

Status in current code
Provided right to counsel and right to remain silent, and apparently required proof by a clear and convincing evidence.
Proposed changes
Retains and clarifies those protections. (pp. 18, 32—33)

anonymous on 02 October 2007 at 13:59

I have been a Cornell faculty member for a long time; I was even involved years ago in various stages of composing the Campus Code. I also have served as an advisor to student complainants in student-on-student harassment cases. The old campus code provides many protections for the accused and assumes that the accuser is the university. I hope that the codes committee will ensure in the new version that there are protections for student complainants. In one case in which I was involved, the accused caused great psychological harm to the complainant by successfully ‘gaming’ the system and, in fact, ultimately escaping any significant university penalty as a result.

Copyright © 2005–2019, Cornell University.

Retrieved from /CJCComments/2007FallProceduralProtections

Page last modified on October 02, 2007, at 05:59 PM