Skip to main content


This is an archival copy of the 2006–2017 Assemblies website. This information is no longer updated.

2007 Fall Procedural Protections

« Judicial Administrator Powers | 2007Fall | »

This page contains comments posted by members of the Cornell community pertaining to 2007 Fall Procedural Protections in the current and proposed Campus Code and judicial system. Before posting to this forum, please read the comments below to make sure that the information you are providing is pertinent to the discussion and has not already been addressed before.

Community Comments

Status in current code
Provided right to counsel and right to remain silent, and apparently required proof by a clear and convincing evidence.
Proposed changes
Retains and clarifies those protections. (pp. 18, 32—33)

anonymous on 02 October 2007 at 13:59

I have been a Cornell faculty member for a long time; I was even involved years ago in various stages of composing the Campus Code. I also have served as an advisor to student complainants in student-on-student harassment cases. The old campus code provides many protections for the accused and assumes that the accuser is the university. I hope that the codes committee will ensure in the new version that there are protections for student complainants. In one case in which I was involved, the accused caused great psychological harm to the complainant by successfully ‘gaming’ the system and, in fact, ultimately escaping any significant university penalty as a result.

« Judicial Administrator Powers | 2007Fall | »

Contact CJC Comments

109 Day Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853

ph. (607) 255–3715
fx. (607) 255–2182

Hours: 9a - 12:15p, 1p - 4:30p, M - F