Skip to main content


This is an archival copy of the 2006–2017 Assemblies website. This information is no longer updated.

Conduct of Members

« Public Relations | 2008Spring | Outreach »

This page contains comments posted by members of the Cornell community pertaining to Conduct of Members in the Student Assembly. Before posting to this forum, please read the comments below to make sure that the information you are providing is pertinent to the discussion. Comments are especially valuable if they add new information or points of view.

Initial Findings

The Student Assembly suffers at the hands of inappropriate conduct of its representatives. An elected representative that makes a statement on behalf of the Student Assembly, or an elected representative that makes a promise — or perhaps, too, a threat — to another person or organization in their capacity as a Student Assembly representative does irreparable harm to our institution of self-governance. There must be a system in place to account for the conduct of Student Assembly representatives.

There is currently no means for suspending a Student Assembly representative. Discussion on the subject has pointed to the injustice done to one’s constituency that no longer has representation on the Student Assembly; a concern of particular note during contentious byline funding hearings. Student Assembly representatives must remain accountable for each others’ actions, and a system of oversight must be created to ensure that members will be held to a high standard, but protected, too, if they sit as the minority.

Potential Solutions

  1. The Student Assembly should utilize the resources of the Division of University Communications, its administrative oversight at the university, to ensure that all new members are versed in professional conduct and communication. A training session, sponsored by the department and co-organized by elected leadership on the Student Assembly, should be held immediately following the elections of freshman and transfer representatives in the fall semester.
  2. The Student Assembly could suspend the seating-privileges of an elected representative for a prescribed amount of time. This would ideally occur within the responsibilities assigned to a new judicial arm of the Student Assembly. In doing so, the Student Assembly must create and pass a resolution that determines the length that suspensions may last. In the event of a suspension, the 2nd place representative for a given elected seat would assume the interim voting responsibilities for that position.

Community Comments

Anonymous on 30 September 2008 at 11:01

Intead of fighting each other. Work together…if the Executive Team actually advocated for all the members then things would get done.

Add a Comment

Please provide your full name and netid in the author box. If you wish to leave an anonymous comment, please put “Anonymous” in the author box.

Example: John Smith jds334

Example: Anonymous

Add Comment 
Sign as Author 
Enter code:

« Public Relations | 2008Spring | Outreach »

Contact SA Comments

109 Day Hall

Cornell University

Ithaca, NY 14853

ph. (607) 255—3715

studentassembly@cornell.edu